User talk:PaulPachad

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi PaulPachad! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:24, Sunday, May 22, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

May 2022

Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eliyahu Simpson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 20:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I had too many windows open and reverted your edit instead of another on another article. Very sorry!! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 20:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tommi1986. Hi Tommi, thank you I was the user who added the delete prod, but after further research I see I was in error. Thank you for reaching out! PaulPachad (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I always admit when I make a mistake!! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 20:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tommi, its really nice to meet you. I see that you are a really experienced editor. I created my first page today. Would you be able to look it over to give me some feedback? If you can I would be grateful. If you are busy no worries at all. @Tommi1986 PaulPachad (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulPachad:I would do, however my experience is in anti-vandalism so my knowledge on article creation is limited. I assume this is for the article Eve Barlow? It would appear that it has been marked with a Notability tag. My advice would be to request this to be moved to draft space and work on it, you can then submit it for review where someone with knowledge in this area will be able to advise what you need to do to improve it ready for main space. Alternatively pop by the WP:teahouse and ask for assistance. Please don't feel bad if your article is removed due to issues, the hardest thing to do on Wikipedia is to create new articles (which is why I never have) but look here as well Your First Article for some tips on creating. Sorry I couldn't be much more help to you, but if you ever need help, reach out to me on my talk page and I will do my best!! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 20:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tommi1986 thank you Tommi, you are really so kind. I appreciate you. I hope to be in touch. PaulPachad (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tommi, i just submitted this article, do you think its ready for me to move it to the articlespace?

Draft:Marjorie Stewart (1912–1988) PaulPachad (talk) 01:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PaulPachad

Thank you for creating Penney S. Azcarate.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you North for your very kind words. It really means a lot. I look forward to adding more as I learn more. I am always open to feedback on how to improve, and I know that I can learn alot from experienced editors like you. PaulPachad (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi North, I just created this article, do you think its ready for me to move it to the mainspace? Draft:Marjorie Stewart (1912–1988) PaulPachad (talk) 01:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Abo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Abo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Abo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 20:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PaulPachad! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there a permitted way to ask other wikipedia editors to weigh in on AfD debates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "dead links"

Hello! Per WP:REDYES, red links (or "dead links") are encouraged when a subject does not have an article but could have one. In the case of Sean Suiter, Jenkins is definitely notable and I plan to write an article on him someday. Thanks, Queen of Hearts ^talk 00:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my apologies! PaulPachad (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've now written an article on Jenkins – good work! I'm still surprised we don't have an article on the GTTF itself; I started a draft for it but (stupidly) never saved it onwiki and it's on my computer, which is in the shop. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 00:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, Maybe we can collaborate on that PaulPachad (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gun Trace Task Force – I have access to the two major books on it and have gotten about 30 pages into We Own This City. Cheers, Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 02:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marjorie Stewart (actor) has been accepted

Marjorie Stewart (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youknow? (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Fosslien (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liz Fosslien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PaulPachad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wayne Jenkins (police officer) (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Baltimore Police Department#2017 racketeering indictment. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We often don't write WP:BLP1E. There is nothing notable about this police officer apart from the scandal which is not a widely notable event. I will suggest merging with Baltimore Police Department#2017 racketeering indictment or simply redirect this draft to there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wayne Jenkins (police officer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Fosslien moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Liz Fosslien. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Liz Fosslien has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Liz Fosslien. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind assistance, my friend. I will add sources that are independent PaulPachad (talk) 10:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PaulPachad. Thank you for your work on Wayne Jenkins (police officer). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariah Riddlesprigger has been accepted

Mariah Riddlesprigger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 16:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Chen (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lauren Chen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lauren Chen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Chen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Chen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. I will try my best to defend this. I wish you an amazing weekend! PaulPachad (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Chen

Please revert your close of this AfD. It is extremely inappropriate to close an AfD for an article that you have created. -- asilvering (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done, my sincere apologies PaulPachad (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- asilvering (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to handle the formalities? PaulPachad (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing to be handled at this point, since you've reverted all the relevant edits (thank you!). The discussion should not have been closed this early. -- asilvering (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok understood. I saw that it was closed by another editor, so i assumed they forgot to remove the templates, and did that

My sincere apologies! How many days is typical to close? PaulPachad (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seven days, after which they can be relisted up to three more times if the consensus isn't clear. -- asilvering (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your generous help! I appreciate you. PaulPachad (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek Day (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Was this written by AI? It is written in a weirdly promotional way. Possibly notable, but you need to cut every section after Celebrations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Trek Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Star Trek Day has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Star Trek Day. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Trek Day has been accepted

Star Trek Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your very gracious and kind help PaulPachad (talk) 13:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its a good article, I myself didn't know there was a day ...live long and prosper--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you are so kind! PaulPachad (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malia Obama (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malia Obama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malia Obama (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Malia Obama. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Family of Barack Obama. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Family of Barack Obama.

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

Please discuss at Talk:Family of Barack Obama as to whether Malia Obama is individually notable, before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malia Obama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REFPUNCT

I took a look atyour drafts, and something you should know is that references should be right after punctuation, not right before, as you have done. Cheers, Aaron Liu (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, good to know! PaulPachad (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]